For some in oil industry, debate turns to whether Keystone XL pipeline is still needed -
Published Saturday, September 21, 2013 at 1:00 am / Updated at 12:29 am
For some in oil industry, debate turns to whether Keystone XL pipeline is still needed

LINCOLN — With the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline more uncertain than ever, some in the oil industry question whether the highly controversial project is still needed.

The project, which would carry 830,000 barrels of heavy crude through Nebraska on a daily basis, has become the most scrutinized and debated underground pipeline project since it was first proposed five years ago.

Delays have increased speculation that President Barack Obama will reject the pipeline, leading oil producers, shippers and refineries to explore other ways to get oil from western Canada to refineries in the Gulf Coast.

The ramping up of rail transport along with recent announcements of other pipeline projects indicates some investors are hedging their bets on the Keystone XL.

Some argue the pursuit of pipeline alternatives shows that rejecting Keystone XL will only slow the flow of Canadian oil, not stop it.

“I question the naiveté of those who think by shutting down a pipeline, they prevent the development of the oil sands,” said Robert Rapier, a chemical engineer with a background in biofuels who writes a blog about energy trends. “If there isn't Keystone, there are many, many ways of getting it to market.”

Others, including supporters and opponents of the pipeline, say the project remains critically important to the oil industry.

Those working to develop the oil sands region of western Canada point out Keystone XL is furthest down the regulatory road. Pipeline opponents continue to call the pipeline a linchpin that would unleash an environmentally damaging oil resource they refer to as tar sands.

“They are in a real tough spot when it comes to the availability of cheap options to get tar sands to market,” said Anthony Swift, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

When TransCanada Corp. officials submitted the application five years ago, they figured the project would be built by now. After all, the company's first Keystone pipeline, with a daily capacity of nearly 600,000 barrels, went in with little fanfare and virtually no opposition.

Objections to Keystone XL emerged over a route that would have taken the pipeline through the environmentally sensitive Nebraska Sand Hills and above the Ogallala Aquifer. Elected officials, landowners and activists raised concerns. Eventually Gov. Dave Heineman told the company to move the route to avoid possible contamination of the aquifer.

In late 2011, the U.S. State Department postponed a decision on the pipeline over the aquifer issue. TransCanada agreed to reroute the project to skirt the Sand Hills.

In the nearly two years since, blocking the Keystone XL has become a major goal of several national environmental groups. They argue the pipeline will further unlock the oil sands region to development and, since that source creates more carbon pollution than conventional crude, contribute significantly to climate change.

The application for the pipeline has since undergone reviews by Nebraska's environmental agency and the State Department. The reviews found the project presented no major threats to land, water or global temperatures.

Those conclusions, however are disputed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and many environmentalists.

Currently, the State Department is sorting through more than 1 million comments received on the preliminary environmental review. The president is not expected to reach a decision until late this year or early next year.

The delays and debate have not diminished the importance of Keystone XL to the petroleum industry, said Greg Stringham, vice president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.

“It is still very strategic for Canada to be able to access the Gulf Coast refineries,” he said.

Stringham acknowledged, however, that investors and shippers aren't standing by while the project remains in limbo. The rail industry, in particular, appears to be taking advantage of the delay.

By some projections, railroads could load up to 800,000 barrels of heavy Canadian crude daily by 2015. That's nearly as much oil as would move through Keystone XL.

Two years ago, for example, rail transported about 10,000 barrels daily of diluted bitumen, the type of heavy oil mined in Canada. Now, railroads load close to 200,000 barrels daily, Stringham said.

The American Association of Railroads views pipelines and railroads as safe and sees a role for both in transporting crude.

The growth of oil-by-rail hasn't been without criticism. The practice is being more closely scrutinized since July, when railcars loaded with North Dakota crude derailed and exploded, killing 47 people in a small town in Quebec.

In addition, it costs significantly more to ship oil by train than by pipeline.

But rail provides more flexibility for producers to get their oil to market. And existing rail lines do not need the president's approval to bring Canadian oil into the U.S.

While most of the oil in the Keystone XL would flow from Canada, about 100,000 barrels of its daily volume would originate in the booming oil fields of North Dakota and Montana. But the head of one of the biggest oil producers in North Dakota has said Keystone XL has become all but irrelevant.

Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental Resources, recently told the National Journal that rail transportation and other pipelines have emerged to ship North Dakota's oil. And more are planned.

“It's not critical any longer,” Hamm said of Keystone XL. “They just waited too long. The industry is very innovative, and it finds other ways of doing it and other routes.”

Shawn Howard, spokesman for TransCanada Corp., said Keystone XL remains just as necessary today as when it was first proposed in 2008. Thursday marked the fifth anniversary of its application for a presidential permit.

The company has signed contracts with oil producers and refiners that will fill the pipeline near capacity if it is built, he said.

Howard called the use of rail a “short-term response” because of its higher costs. And he pointed out that federal studies have shown pipelines to be the safest transportation method for liquid fuels.

But a pipeline can't deliver oil until it's built, said Bill Day, spokesman for Valero Energy Corp., which operates Gulf Coast refineries capable of processing bitumen. The company had a contract with Keystone XL, but it has expired, he said.

Valero is currently upgrading some Louisiana refinery units to receive Canadian oil via rail and other pipeline proposals that would not need a presidential permit.

“One way or another, the oil will find its way to the Gulf Coast or find its way to other countries,” Day said.

Meanwhile, pipeline companies aren't surrendering to rail. TransCanada recently proposed a different pipeline that would move 1.1 million barrels per day to eastern Canada, therefore avoiding American politics. Others have been proposed to take oil to Canada's West Coast, and pipeline builder Enbridge has announced a project that would move more Canadian oil out of Illinois to the Gulf.

Environmental groups and others don't buy that argument. They cite recent analysis by major investment firms that predict if Keystone XL fails to win approval, development of the Canadian oil sands could stagnate.

All parties with a stake in the fight will continue to closely follow Keystone XL, said pipeline opponent Jane Kleeb, executive director of Bold Nebraska.

“If Keystone XL is denied, it could have a domino effect on other pipelines of a similar nature,” she said. “If they lose this pipeline, it puts doubt on their investment.”

Contact the writer: Joe Duggan    |  

Joe works in the Lincoln bureau, where he helps cover state government, the Legislature, state Supreme Court and southeast Nebraska.

Keystone XL pipeline backers blast ‘political expediency’ as foes hail ruling to delay decision
Interstate construction to cause lane shifts, closings in Omaha area
Man, 21, shot in ankle while walking near 30th, W Streets
Teenager arrested after woman's purse is snatched outside Omaha store
Kelly: A California university president returns to her Nebraska roots on Ivy Day
17 senators in Nebraska Legislature hit their (term) limits
Slaying of woman in Ralston apartment likely over drugs, police say
Dems criticize governor hopeful Beau McCoy's ad in which he strikes a Barack Obama doll
Omahan charged in fatal shooting in Benson neighborhood
Friday's attendance dips at Millard West after bathroom threat
High school slam poets don't just recite verses, 'they leave their hearts beating on the stage'
Crack ring's leaders join others in prison as a result of Operation Purple Haze
High court denies death row appeal of cult leader convicted of murder
Haze in area comes from Kansas, Oklahoma
Man taken into custody in domestic dispute
Omaha judge reprimanded for intervening in peer attorney's DUI case
Intoxicated man with pellet gun climbs billboard's scaffold; is arrested
Police seek public's help in finding an armed man
Saturday forecast opens window for gardening; Easter egg hunts look iffy on Sunday
Database: How much did Medicare pay your doctor?
Last day of 2014 Legislature: Praise, passage of a last few bills and more on mountain lions
New public employee pay data: Douglas, Lancaster, Sarpy Counties, plus utilities
A voice of experience: Ex-gang member helps lead fight against Omaha violence
Church is pressing its case for old Temple Israel site
OPPD board holding public forum, open house May 7
< >
Kelly: A California university president returns to her Nebraska roots on Ivy Day
The main speaker at today's Ivy Day celebration at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln is a college president who grew up roping calves and earned her Ph.D. at the prestigious Oxford University in England.
Breaking Brad: Stuck in a claw machine? You get no Easter candy
I know of one kid in Lincoln who will be receiving a lump of coal from the Easter Bunny, just as soon as he's extricated from that bowling alley claw machine.
Breaking Brad: Mountain lion season's over, but the bunny's fair game!
Thursday was the last day of a Nebraska Legislature session. Before leaving town, legislators passed a bill to hold a lottery to hunt the Easter Bunny.
Breaking Brad: At least my kid never got stuck inside a claw machine
We need a new rule in Lincoln. If your kid is discovered inside the claw machine at a bowling alley, you are forever barred from being nominated for "Mother of the Year."
Breaking Brad: How many MECA board members can we put in a luxury suite?
As a stunt at the Blue Man Group show, MECA board members are going to see how many people they can stuff into one luxury suite.
Deadline Deal thumbnail
The Jaipur in Rockbrook Village
Half Off Fine Indian Cuisine & Drinks! $15 for Dinner, or $7 for Lunch
Buy Now
< >
Omaha World-Herald Contests
Enter for a chance to win great prizes.
OWH Store: Buy photos, books and articles
Buy photos, books and articles
Travel Snaps Photo
Going on Vacation? Take the Omaha World-Herald with you and you could the next Travel Snaps winner.
Click here to donate to Goodfellows
The 2011 Goodfellows fund drive provided holiday meals to nearly 5,000 families and their children, and raised more than $500,000 to help families in crisis year round.
Want to get World-Herald stories sent directly to your home or work computer? Sign up for's News Alerts and you will receive e-mails with the day's top stories.
Can't find what you need? Click here for site map »