In wake of Nikko Jenkins case, changing 'good time' sentencing law debated -
Published Saturday, September 7, 2013 at 1:00 am / Updated at 12:25 pm
In wake of Nikko Jenkins case, changing 'good time' sentencing law debated

Gov. Dave Heineman and others are calling for changes to the state's system for carrying out criminal sentences in the wake of allegations that Nikko Jenkins killed four people within weeks of his release from prison.

Now there's debate as to whether changes are needed in the law itself or in the way the prison system handles its responsibility under the law.

Heineman and others are calling for dramatic changes to the state's “good-time law,” which gives most prisoners one day off their sentence for each day they spend behind bars without violating prison rules.

“Good time shouldn't be automatically given to a prisoner,” said Heineman, who is calling for a two-tiered approach to how prisoners earn time off their sentences.

“And that's the way the system works right now. With the really hardened criminal, the really bad guy, we've got to protect the public.”

Others say that the law is fine and that the problem is prison rules that make it difficult to keep dangerous criminals behind bars.

“There's a failure here in the system … the rules and regulations,” said State Sen. Brad Ashford of Omaha.

Prison rules are under Heineman's purview, while any overhaul of the law would go through Ashford's Judicial Committee. Each seems to be putting the problem at the other's feet.

Heineman said he'd like to explore a more stringent policy for violent offenders, one that keeps them in prison for the duration of their sentence unless they demonstrate good behavior. The current law presumes that prisoners are behaving, he said, then takes credit away when they break rules.

While that's a good incentive for nonviolent criminals, he said, dangerous inmates should plan to serve their whole sentence or earn time off.

Sen. Burke Harr of Omaha, though, said attacking the good-time law would have unintended consequences.

Judges know how good time works, he said, and sentence accordingly. A 25-year sentence means they'll be out in 12.

“It's rote. Everyone knows. Every judge understands that,” he said. “If we tell our violent criminals, 'You have no reason to behave,' then they have no reason to behave.”

Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha went one step further.

“I will fight tooth and nail anybody who tries to take it away,” he said.

Sen. Colby Coash of Lincoln, a Judiciary Committee member, said lawmakers need to decide whether this case represents a failure of the system or an unusual situation.

“When we have a tragedy like this, we have to take a look at it,” he said.

But Coash said he doesn't want to make sweeping changes in good time policy based on one case. He also is hesitant about getting the Legislature more deeply involved in the operations of an executive branch agency. Corrections officials have more expertise than lawmakers in weighing the risks involved when setting good-time policies.

“What I've been told, and what I believe, is that good time is an effective way to motivate individuals,” he said.

The good-time law isn't unique to Nebraska. Alison Lawrence, a senior policy specialist with the National Conference of State Legislatures, said 32 states offer inmates good-time credit. The laws are designed to reduce prison populations and save money, she said.

It's hard to compare Nebraska's law to others because the details can vary dramatically from state to state. Like Nebraska, most states leave it to their corrections departments to administer the programs, making them even more difficult to compare.

For example, Jenkins was originally put in prison for robbery. Had that happened in Iowa, he would have faced a mandatory sentence of either 10 or 25 years. He would have to serve at least 70 percent of the sentence.

Then, depending on his behavior in prison, he could be released.

“The devil of these policies is in the details, and it's often given to the Department of Corrections,” Lawrence said.

Such is the case in Nebraska.

The rules for docking a prisoner's good time are crafted by the Department of Correctional Services. They've remained fundamentally unchanged for more than 20 years, according to a department spokeswoman.

For egregious offenses, such as assault or murder, the maximum amount of time a prisoner can lose is just one year.

For nonviolent offenses, the maximum is three months, and for many infractions it's even less.

In addition, prison officials don't always take away good-time credit to punish an inmate. Instead, they can opt for segregation.

Last year, about 1,600 inmates were punished for class one misconduct, which is breaking one of 13 prison rules that cover the most serious offenses, such as manslaughter, weapon possession, escape and drug abuse.

The average good-time credit those inmates lost last year was six days.

“It does seem absurd,” said Ashford, the Judiciary Committee chairman. “We have to review it. We have to.”

One option, he said, would be for the Legislature to take control of how prisoners lose good-time credit once they're in prison. As it stands, the punishments are spelled out by the Correctional Services Department.

The department could change those rules without going through the Legislature, or the Legislature could put rules into law to either make it easier for prison officials to essentially add time to a sentence or to require them to do so.

Ashford said the good-time law isn't the problem, rather “it's the implementation of sanctions. We need to ask the department why the administrative sanctions were not given.”

Even under existing rules, prison officials could have kept Jenkins behind bars through at least April of next year.

While in prison, he assaulted another inmate, he was involved in an attack in the shower, he was caught with a toilet-brush shank and attacked a corrections officer.

He lost good-time credit on eight occasions, which kept him in prison about another year and a half.

Because of those violations, prison officials under current rules could have kept him at least another 9 months. He lost three months for an assault but could have been punished with up to a year for that. He lost a month for “tattoo activities,” which could have carried an extra 15 days.

There may have been other times where Jenkins was punished with time in segregation rather than a loss of good-time credit, but those records aren't made available to the public.

Dawn-Renee Smith, a spokeswoman for the Department of Correctional Services, said prison officials don't take away good-time credit without careful consideration.

“We don't use good time as a hammer,” she said.

In the coming months, she said, the department will evaluate how often it takes away prisoners' good-time credit and whether officials are going as far as they should in disciplinary cases.

The department is doing a full review of how they handled Jenkins while in custody and the circumstances of his release. The department is already looking at procedures that might need to change, she said.

Contact the writer: Matt Wynn    |   402-444-3144    |  

Matt does document- and data-driven stories and builds things for the Web that leverage both.

Man, 21, shot in ankle while walking near 30th, W Streets
Kelly: A California university president returns to her Nebraska roots on Ivy Day
17 senators in Nebraska Legislature hit their (term) limits
Slaying of woman in Ralston apartment likely over drugs, police say
Keystone XL pipeline backers blast ‘political expediency’ as foes hail ruling to delay decision
Dems criticize governor hopeful Beau McCoy's ad in which he strikes a Barack Obama doll
Omahan charged in fatal shooting in Benson neighborhood
Friday's attendance dips at Millard West after bathroom threat
High school slam poets don't just recite verses, 'they leave their hearts beating on the stage'
Crack ring's leaders join others in prison as a result of Operation Purple Haze
High court denies death row appeal of cult leader convicted of murder
Haze in area comes from Kansas, Oklahoma
Man taken into custody in domestic dispute
Omaha judge reprimanded for intervening in peer attorney's DUI case
Intoxicated man with pellet gun climbs billboard's scaffold; is arrested
Police seek public's help in finding an armed man
Saturday forecast opens window for gardening; Easter egg hunts look iffy on Sunday
Database: How much did Medicare pay your doctor?
Last day of 2014 Legislature: Praise, passage of a last few bills and more on mountain lions
New public employee pay data: Douglas, Lancaster, Sarpy Counties, plus utilities
A voice of experience: Ex-gang member helps lead fight against Omaha violence
Church is pressing its case for old Temple Israel site
OPPD board holding public forum, open house May 7
The thrill of the skill: Omaha hosts statewide contest for students of the trades
A recap of what got done — and what didn't — in the 2014 legislative session
< >
Kelly: A California university president returns to her Nebraska roots on Ivy Day
The main speaker at today's Ivy Day celebration at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln is a college president who grew up roping calves and earned her Ph.D. at the prestigious Oxford University in England.
Breaking Brad: Stuck in a claw machine? You get no Easter candy
I know of one kid in Lincoln who will be receiving a lump of coal from the Easter Bunny, just as soon as he's extricated from that bowling alley claw machine.
Breaking Brad: Mountain lion season's over, but the bunny's fair game!
Thursday was the last day of a Nebraska Legislature session. Before leaving town, legislators passed a bill to hold a lottery to hunt the Easter Bunny.
Breaking Brad: At least my kid never got stuck inside a claw machine
We need a new rule in Lincoln. If your kid is discovered inside the claw machine at a bowling alley, you are forever barred from being nominated for "Mother of the Year."
Breaking Brad: How many MECA board members can we put in a luxury suite?
As a stunt at the Blue Man Group show, MECA board members are going to see how many people they can stuff into one luxury suite.
Deadline Deal thumbnail
The Jaipur in Rockbrook Village
Half Off Fine Indian Cuisine & Drinks! $15 for Dinner, or $7 for Lunch
Buy Now
< >
Omaha World-Herald Contests
Enter for a chance to win great prizes.
OWH Store: Buy photos, books and articles
Buy photos, books and articles
Travel Snaps Photo
Going on Vacation? Take the Omaha World-Herald with you and you could the next Travel Snaps winner.
Click here to donate to Goodfellows
The 2011 Goodfellows fund drive provided holiday meals to nearly 5,000 families and their children, and raised more than $500,000 to help families in crisis year round.
Want to get World-Herald stories sent directly to your home or work computer? Sign up for's News Alerts and you will receive e-mails with the day's top stories.
Can't find what you need? Click here for site map »